Risk management
-
Message received
David Hancock’s clarification of the developing new relationship Government has with the infrastructure industry was welcomed by participants at the round table event. -
Integrated Project Insurance: what is it, can you benefit from it?
Find out about a revolutionary style of insurance that allows blame free project relationships and encourages collaboration at a free IPI masterclass. -
Integrated Project Insurance prepares to move on site at Dudley
First trials of a project operating with Integrated Project Insurance is now underway in Dudley in the West Midlands. -
Changing behaviour
Government is attempting to become more SME friendly in its contracts with trials of new procurement methods. Jackie Whitelaw reports from the latest Griffiths & Armour and Infrastructure Intelligence risk management forum. -
New: Risk Matters Hub – advice from the experts on how to keep your business safe
Infrastructure Intelligence is working in collaboration with Griffiths & Armour to help share best practice, improve risk awareness, and assist effective management of risk. -
CIC/BIM INS first edition 2013
Best practice guide for professional indemnity insurance when using BIM -
What is the CIC BIM protocol
This is a supplementary legal agreement that is incorporated into professional services appointments and construction contracts by means of a simple amendment. -
Contractors top the risk register
What are the risks concerning consultants in the current market? And how do you help alleviate them. The latest Griffiths & Armour/Infrastructure Intelligence meeting found out. Jackie Whitelaw reports. -
No.10 - Costain Ltd v Charles Haswell & Partners Ltd
This case illustrates how a contractor may be able to claim damages for costs incurred as a result of a consultant’s negligent advice, but only to the extent that causation and loss can be proved. -
No.9 - 199 Knightsbridge Development Ltd v WSP UK Ltd
This case highlights that even in circumstances where a professional is found to have breached his duty of care, if the steps that should have been taken would not have prevented the damage caused then the professional cannot be held liable for any losses arising.